Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No pie #5809

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 21, 2016
Merged

No pie #5809

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 21, 2016

Conversation

ctiller
Copy link
Member

@ctiller ctiller commented Mar 18, 2016

No description provided.

@vjpai
Copy link
Member

vjpai commented Mar 18, 2016

Was this also a workaround for some previous problem?

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016, 5:28 PM Craig Tiller notifications@github.com wrote:


You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

#5809
Commit Summary

  • Update clang for the Dockerfile used in tsan tests
  • Remove JENKINS_BUILD specific options from tsan
  • Disable PIE

File Changes

Patch Links:


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#5809

@ctiller
Copy link
Member Author

ctiller commented Mar 18, 2016

It was. An older TSAN needed it IIRC. This seems to fix the TSAN issues...
Or at least the failures now seem legitimate. Hoping you or dgq or Sree can
take a peek soon.

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016, 5:31 PM Vijay Pai notifications@github.com wrote:

Was this also a workaround for some previous problem?

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016, 5:28 PM Craig Tiller notifications@github.com
wrote:


You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

#5809
Commit Summary

  • Update clang for the Dockerfile used in tsan tests
  • Remove JENKINS_BUILD specific options from tsan
  • Disable PIE

File Changes

Patch Links:


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#5809


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#5809 (comment)

@vjpai
Copy link
Member

vjpai commented Mar 18, 2016

Very interesting. Yes, I can take a look at the real tsan issue today. It all seems to be from Initializer, which is always interesting. Correction: 8 caused by initializing, 1 from connectivity-state.

@vjpai
Copy link
Member

vjpai commented Mar 19, 2016

The remaining tsan failure after #5843 is something that I started to fix previously in #5489 but closed because we hadn't really seen it in the wild and it might be a false positive - but I think that I need to put it back in, cleanly if possible. Specifically, commit 9d92cc6 is potentially useful (or something like it), but the other commit in that PR needs a solution that will properly handle #5656 .

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants