Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 14, 2024. It is now read-only.

feat(crons): Update SDK docs for empty check-ins #950

Conversation

evanpurkhiser
Copy link
Member

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented May 30, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
develop ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback May 30, 2023 8:44pm

@evanpurkhiser evanpurkhiser requested a review from a team May 30, 2023 20:41
This may be provided as a empty UUID (128 bit zero value) to indicate to
Sentry that the checkin should update the previous check-in that is not in
the terminal state. If the most recent check-in is already in a terminal
state a new one will be created instead.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It might be worth clarifying what terminal state means.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah reverse the logic so it should "update the most recent check-in in an in progress state. If the most recent check-in is not in progress..."

evanpurkhiser added a commit to getsentry/sentry that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2023
This is to support getsentry/relay#2153

Provdes a means to creating check-ins without giving a check_in_id in
the consumer payload.

Documentation for this is here getsentry/develop#950

Fixes: #49664
evanpurkhiser added a commit to getsentry/sentry that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2023
This is to support getsentry/relay#2153

Provdes a means to creating check-ins without giving a check_in_id in
the consumer payload.

Documentation for this is here
getsentry/develop#950

Fixes: #49664
@evanpurkhiser evanpurkhiser merged commit 24ec816 into master Jun 5, 2023
@evanpurkhiser evanpurkhiser deleted the evanpurkhiser/feat-crons-update-sdk-docs-for-empty-check-ins branch June 5, 2023 19:45
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants