Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The Dogecoin parser finishes work ahead of time. #75

Closed
Napulsnik opened this issue May 12, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

The Dogecoin parser finishes work ahead of time. #75

Napulsnik opened this issue May 12, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@Napulsnik
Copy link

Hello. The Dogecoin parser finishes work ahead of time.

...
[14:32:16] INFO - parser: Status: 1712245 Blocks processed. (left: 2014821, avg:  2140 blocks/sec)
[14:32:26] INFO - parser: Status: 1738425 Blocks processed. (left: 1988641, avg:  2146 blocks/sec)
[14:32:36] INFO - parser: Status: 1764659 Blocks processed. (left: 1962407, avg:  2152 blocks/sec)
[14:32:49] INFO - parser: Done. Processed 1788760 blocks in 13.88 minutes. (avg:  2149 blocks/sec)
[14:32:52] INFO - callback: Done.
Dumped 952803 addresses.
[14:32:52] INFO - main: Fin.
@bkulcsar
Copy link

Same here, and also --start and --end paramters not working.

@gcarq
Copy link
Owner

gcarq commented Mar 21, 2023

Is it the same block where it stops? Please add the command how you started it and some relevant log lines so that it can be reproduced easier.

@bkulcsar
Copy link

Thanks for the fast response!

I started it with the following command: ./rusty-blockparser -c dogecoin -d /mnt/d/Dogecoin/blocks balances
It stoped at block: 1788760
In the logs same as Napulsnik's, no errors just:
[09:42:36] INFO - parser: Status: 1788760 Blocks processed. (left: 2854972, avg: 313 blocks/sec)
[09:42:49] INFO - parser: Done. Processed 1788760 blocks in 54.64 minutes. (avg: 313 blocks/sec)
[09:42:52] INFO - callback: Done.

I also tried to start with:
./rusty-blockparser -c dogecoin -d /mnt/d/Dogecoin/blocks -s 1788760 -e 4643736 balances

But it finished way more faster and only processed 10,000 blocks, again no errors.

@gcarq
Copy link
Owner

gcarq commented Apr 18, 2023

Duplicate of #80. Please try out master branch, the issue should be fixed there

@gcarq gcarq closed this as completed Apr 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants