Support dots in directory names when running with esm: true #168
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As the title suggests, before this PR if you had something like:
The process of determining package type by ascending the parent directory chain would break, because eventually
!!extname("src.abc")
would be true and we'd runfileURLToPath
on a non-URL because the first call withmain.ts
would haveisFilePath
true, and hence would have stripped thefile:///
.We could add it back, but as called out in the comment, checking
extname
is not a perfect solution. Instead, we allow passing in whether or not the given path is a file path or not, because as we ascend we know with certainty that we have directories. It's just the first call where we're uncertain, and will do a slightly more expensivereaddir
check. This should also be able to handle scenarios where you import a directory with anindex.ts
, for example.There was also a secondary problem we had here: if we found a
package.json
file while ascending, but it had notype
value, we'd keep ascending. This is actually wrong, as per the node docs that state: