Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: eslint normalization #52

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 22, 2021
Merged

Conversation

fi3ework
Copy link
Owner

@fi3ework fi3ework commented Jul 22, 2021

@fgblomqvist Sorry I made a mistake to force push to your branch and I recreate a PR. 😅

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #52 (1719b7a) into main (5b0ac3a) will increase coverage by 3.42%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #52      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   31.59%   35.01%   +3.42%     
==========================================
  Files          13       13              
  Lines         576      574       -2     
  Branches      118      117       -1     
==========================================
+ Hits          182      201      +19     
+ Misses        394      372      -22     
- Partials        0        1       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
packages/vite-plugin-checker/src/logger.ts 45.94% <100.00%> (+17.62%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5b0ac3a...1719b7a. Read the comment docs.

@fi3ework fi3ework merged commit 95aa772 into main Jul 22, 2021
@fi3ework
Copy link
Owner Author

@fgblomqvist Thank you very much! 👍

@fi3ework fi3ework deleted the fgblomqvist-fix-eslint-normalization branch July 22, 2021 18:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants