Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SQL] NULL values for columns with LATENESS are never considered late #2518

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 21, 2024

Conversation

mihaibudiu
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #2517

Copy link
Contributor

@ryzhyk ryzhyk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure that storing NULL timestamps forever is the right approach.

@mihaibudiu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

What do you suggest?

@mihaibudiu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Either the type is not null, and then it's clear what to do. If the type is nullable it means that null timestamps are expected. And then it means they have to be processed. Whether they are kept forever depends on what else the program does to them.

@mihaibudiu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ryzhyk I don't think we can do any better than this, can you please approve this so we can merge it?

@mihaibudiu mihaibudiu added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 21, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a conflict with the base branch Sep 21, 2024
Signed-off-by: Mihai Budiu <mbudiu@feldera.com>
@mihaibudiu mihaibudiu added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 21, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit c7f492f Sep 21, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@mihaibudiu mihaibudiu deleted the issue2517 branch September 21, 2024 04:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

NULL-able column with LATENESS drops inputs.
2 participants