Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use statbuf structure directly to store the handful of stat derived values #298

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 29, 2021

Conversation

eteran
Copy link
Owner

@eteran eteran commented Jan 29, 2021

The majority of the fields in a statbuf were being replicated
in DocumentInfo to track various attributes of the document.
Unfortunately, this structure is very OS specific. So supporting
it properly was going to require a lot of #ifdefs...

So better to just use statbuf to store them!
Will also with issue #252 since several of the errors there was
regarding not knowing the types for OS/2 versions of these fields.

in DocumentInfo to track various attributes of the document.
Unfortunately, this structure is very OS specific. So supporting
it properly was going to require a lot of #ifdefs...

So better to just use statbuf to store them!
Will also with issue #252 since several of the errors there was
regarding not knowing the types for OS/2 versions of these fields.
@eteran eteran merged commit f73b54d into master Jan 29, 2021
@eteran eteran deleted the use-statebuf branch January 29, 2021 04:37
1div0 pushed a commit to 1div0/nedit-ng that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2021
…alues (eteran#298)

* The majority of the fields in a statbuf were being replicated
in DocumentInfo to track various attributes of the document.
Unfortunately, this structure is very OS specific. So supporting
it properly was going to require a lot of #ifdefs...

So better to just use statbuf to store them!
Will also with issue eteran#252 since several of the errors there was
regarding not knowing the types for OS/2 versions of these fields.

* formatting
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant