-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: review solana trades setup #5979
chore: review solana trades setup #5979
Conversation
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ | |||
{{ config( | |||
schema = 'magiceden_solana', | |||
alias = 'events', | |||
|
|||
tags =['prod_exclude'], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if we're just moving the lineage around, is there a reason this is explicitly excluded?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah good catch, I though it already was disabled.
Let's try one more time and see if the CI can handle it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh boy, maybe CI can't handle it
waiting for #6026 to continue on this |
This places the older solana models under the newer
nft_solana.trades
spell (be it with a lot of null columns).The PR also introduces a backlink from
nft_solana.trades
back tonft.base_trades
so we can have all solana trades in there as well (currently not completely linked as discussed with Alan)