Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-enable iceberg extension #15456

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2025
Merged

Re-enable iceberg extension #15456

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2025

Conversation

carlopi
Copy link
Contributor

@carlopi carlopi commented Dec 23, 2024

No description provided.

@carlopi
Copy link
Contributor Author

carlopi commented Dec 31, 2024

I think this should be good to go.

@Mytherin Mytherin merged commit 13ff921 into duckdb:main Jan 2, 2025
42 of 43 checks passed
@Mytherin
Copy link
Collaborator

Mytherin commented Jan 2, 2025

Thanks!

@carlopi carlopi deleted the reenable_iceberg branch January 2, 2025 13:31
github-actions bot pushed a commit to duckdb/duckdb-r that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2025
github-actions bot added a commit to duckdb/duckdb-r that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2025
Re-enable iceberg extension (duckdb/duckdb#15456)

Co-authored-by: krlmlr <krlmlr@users.noreply.github.com>
carlopi added a commit to carlopi/duckdb that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2025
This is a revert of duckdb#15456, that reintroduced it.

When building Boost::filesystem, an iceberg VCPKG's dependency, in the context of the
linux_arm64 cross-compiled platform there is a funny dependency on a specific CMake version.

While investigating, it's saner to remove it from CI and avoid unneded failures.

"I'll be back", duckdb-iceberg
@carlopi carlopi mentioned this pull request Jan 14, 2025
Mytherin added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2025
This is a revert of #15456, that
reintroduced it.

When building Boost::filesystem, an iceberg VCPKG's dependency, in the
context of the linux_arm64 cross-compiled platform there is a funny
dependency on a specific CMake version.

While investigating, it's saner to remove it from CI and avoid unneded
failures.

"I'll be back", duckdb-iceberg
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants