-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 564
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add NetHttpsBinding test coverage. #1160
Add NetHttpsBinding test coverage. #1160
Conversation
StephenBonikowsky
commented
May 13, 2016
- Adding tests for NetHttpsBinding.
- Fixes Need scenario test coverage for Client Certificates on http. #507
Clearly something isn't happy 😀 |
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ | |||
using System.Xml; | |||
using Xunit; | |||
|
|||
public static class DuplexChannelShapeTests | |||
public static partial class DuplexChannelShapeTests |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Need to add " : ConditionalWcfTest" to this line to make it derive from the base class containing the ConditionalFact conditions. I know you already did that in the other partial class for this, but the partial type declarations should match.
* Adding tests for NetHttpsBinding. * Fixes dotnet#507
3ad8f65
to
f641d96
Compare
Updated |
@dotnet-bot test all outerloop please |
Note: looking at the Console output for the Ubuntu failures, we apparently succeeded in installing the certs:
But then the tests fail with:
These look like the same reason for failure as listed in #1123. We may want to ActiveIssue these tests with #1123 as we did those other tests. |
I think you are right, will update with that ActiveIssue. |
Be aware #1129 has asked to not use ActiveIssue(1123) for those other tests but condition with ConditionalFact. But because we haven't decided what that ConditionalFact would test for, I don't see any option but to ActiveIssue these tests with 1123 and know we need to come back and ConditionalFact them later. |
After discussing this further, going to merge and we will treat these tests just like the other ones in terms of how to get them working or skipped on Linux runs. In the meantime they add coverage on Windows. |
LGTM |