Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Missing LICENSE file? #101

Closed
zoobab opened this issue Nov 15, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Missing LICENSE file? #101

zoobab opened this issue Nov 15, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@zoobab
Copy link
Collaborator

zoobab commented Nov 15, 2022

Hi,

During the Gerrit code review of openocd patches, someone raised the issue of a missing LICENSE file.

We should add one for the clarity, which one should we use?

Best
@jeanthom
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi Benjamin,

The source code of DirtyJTAG has always been available under the MIT license, as stated in every source file header - in that sense there is no licensing ambiguity. However I do agree that adding a LICENSE file would improve clarity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@zoobab @jeanthom