Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

recommended architecture and deploy docs #4795

Merged
1 commit merged into from
Mar 9, 2020
Merged

recommended architecture and deploy docs #4795

1 commit merged into from
Mar 9, 2020

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Mar 3, 2020

This updates and simplifies the documentation on the recommended architecture
and deployment.

Probably best reviewed with the loca preview function on the branch.

Pull Request Checklist

  • Read and understand the contribution guidelines
  • Include appropriate tests
  • Set a descriptive title and thorough description
  • Add a reference to the issue this PR will solve, if appropriate
  • Include changelog additions in one or more commit message bodies between the CHANGELOG_BEGIN and CHANGELOG_END tags
  • Normal production system change, include purpose of change in description

NOTE: CI is not automatically run on non-members pull-requests for security
reasons. The reviewer will have to comment with /AzurePipelines run to
trigger the build.

@ghost ghost requested review from bame-da, hurryabit and nemanja-da as code owners March 3, 2020 13:59
@ghost ghost force-pushed the recommended_path_docs branch 2 times, most recently from 5074265 to f7fddf7 Compare March 3, 2020 14:02
Copy link
Contributor

@cocreature cocreature left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work, I’ll leave the approval to the expert on documentation @nemanja-da 🙂

docs/source/deploy/sandbox.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/source/deploy/sandbox.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/source/app-dev/app-arch.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/source/app-dev/app-arch.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/source/app-dev/app-arch.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/source/app-dev/app-arch.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/source/app-dev/app-arch.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/source/app-dev/app-arch.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
@ghost ghost self-requested a review March 5, 2020 14:37
@ghost ghost requested a review from stefanobaghino-da as a code owner March 5, 2020 14:37
@stefanobaghino-da
Copy link
Contributor

Is there some rebase to do here? 🤔

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Mar 5, 2020

not sure what's going on with the code owners here.

@garyverhaegen-da
Copy link
Contributor

Given that we're squash-merging on master, you should not try to update your local branches by merging (otherwise this happens). I've found the best way to work with a squashed main branch is to always rebase and keep PRs to a single commit.

@ghost ghost force-pushed the recommended_path_docs branch 2 times, most recently from 49134b3 to 603f8c1 Compare March 5, 2020 18:24
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Mar 5, 2020

squashed to one commit and force pushed.

@ghost ghost force-pushed the recommended_path_docs branch 3 times, most recently from 2e46631 to 3f6b76d Compare March 6, 2020 18:47
@ghost ghost force-pushed the recommended_path_docs branch 2 times, most recently from 2ac1d47 to 1d52e4b Compare March 9, 2020 10:43
@ghost ghost force-pushed the recommended_path_docs branch from 1d52e4b to 02d5275 Compare March 9, 2020 10:44
Copy link
Contributor

@nemanja-da nemanja-da left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tyvm

@ghost ghost merged commit 0e046d9 into master Mar 9, 2020
@ghost ghost deleted the recommended_path_docs branch March 9, 2020 11:15
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants