Nice work so far. Thanks.

As I mentioned multiple times, I consider this decoder business an implementation detail. It's also not really relevant if you want to use this library in the way we recommend with the @daml/ledger library. This library uses the decoder functions and our users don't need to care about this at all.

The documentation at the type level looks fantastic.

Awesome, thank you so much!

I would recommend that once we have the different sections, we rearrange this a bit to move the more reference-style documentation somewhere to the end and start with a simple example of “Here is your daml model, invoke the codegen, this is how you create a template and call a choice”. That should get people started very quickly and then the reference documentation starts to become useful once you take a more detailed look.

Awesome, thank you so much!

I would recommend that once we have the different sections, we rearrange this a bit to move the more reference-style documentation somewhere to the end and start with a simple example of “Here is your daml model, invoke the codegen, this is how you create a template and call a choice”. That should get people started very quickly and then the reference documentation starts to become useful once you take a more detailed look.

Thanks for taking a look @cocreature ! Yes, this is just the first few steps feeling our way . There's obviously more to come (usage in particular) and there'll be rearrangement before it reaches its final form.

Great start. Thanks a lot!