docs(csv,encoding,http,json,media-types,uuid): use rfc-editor.org for RFC links
#4777
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4777 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 91.89% 91.89%
=======================================
Files 485 485
Lines 41314 41314
Branches 5319 5319
=======================================
Hits 37965 37965
Misses 3292 3292
Partials 57 57 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
iuioiua
changed the title
rfc-editor.org for RFC links
iuioiua
changed the title
rfc-editor.org for RFC linksrfc-editor.org for RFC links
iuioiua
approved these changes
May 20, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
www.rfc-editor.orgseems the most official place for hosting RFCs. I think we should always usewww.rfc-editor.orgurls for the references of RFCsref: