Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(ci): skip more jobs in "FAST_MODE" #5311

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2023

Conversation

UdjinM6
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 commented Apr 10, 2023

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

CI should not be running that many jobs in "FAST_MODE"
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/blob/develop/.gitlab-ci.yml#L5

What was done?

assign .skip-in-fast-mode-template template to more jobs

How Has This Been Tested?

ran CI in my repo
before: https://gitlab.com/UdjinM6/dash/-/pipelines/832175740
after: https://gitlab.com/UdjinM6/dash/-/pipelines/832176325

Breaking Changes

n/a

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

For repository code-owners and collaborators only

  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 added this to the 20 milestone Apr 10, 2023
extends: .build-template
extends:
- .build-template
- .skip-in-fast-mode-template
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think fuzz build is important for fast mode because usually it catches high percentage of all failures.

There is almost hundred of C++ source and any changes in class/structure interfaces, any noticeable big refactoring or big changes almost always cause a fail during fuzz build.

I vote for keeping linux64_fuzz-build in fast-mode

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmmm... but we don't really run src/test/fuzz/fuzz anywhere as far as I can tell, we just compile it

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 requested a review from knst April 12, 2023 23:02
@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 requested a review from PastaPastaPasta April 12, 2023 23:02
Copy link
Collaborator

@knst knst left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't often use fast-mode, so, utACK

Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK for squash merge

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta merged commit f4eaf5a into dashpay:develop Apr 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants