Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 89.75762% with 524 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.86%. Comparing base (ded0d4d) to head (471605f).
Report is 12 commits behind head on main.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #392      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.66%   88.86%   +2.20%     
==========================================
  Files          49       59      +10     
  Lines        6987     9118    +2131     
==========================================
+ Hits         6055     8103    +2048     
- Misses        932     1015      +83     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Current status

Todos:

1. Extract remaining commands in cocogitto into their dedicated crate.
2. Remove use only cocogitto-config in the cli.
3. Rename cog to cocogitto.
4. cocogitto-hook doesn't need cocogitto-tag, just semver + a display impl for HookVersion.
5. Remove usage of cocogitto-commit in cocogitto-changelog (flatten ChangelogCommit).
6. Make use of this_error for non-user facing errors?
7. Track usage of log (should be only used in command crates).
8. rewrite the CI and Release steps to monorepo mode.
9. Pre-release.
10. Start dog fooding.

There will be a lot more to do, but from there we should be able to start reviewing per crate test coverage, split e2e tests into their respective command crates, implement the missing mutli tag ref for mono repo changelogs.

✔️ 6a6bf74...471605f - Conventional commits check succeeded.

Unfortunately thats a no go, we need a dependency tree solver in cocogitto to be able to release this on crates.io.
This might serve as an exemple for later monorepo refactoring.