Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add missing datalab related imports to multi-label tutorial #984

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2024

Conversation

huiwengoh
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

🎯 Purpose: Describe the objective of your changes in this Pull-Request.

📜 Example Usage: If adding new functionality, strive to provide a minimal working example (MWE) that demonstrates end-to-end usage and output of your new methods. If creating a MWE is not feasible, a conceptual code snippet showcasing the usage is also appreciated. Ensure that the code provided can be copied, pasted, and run without modifications.

Adds missing datalab related imports to multi-label tutorial.

Impact

🌐 Areas Affected: Enumerate modules, functions, or documentation impacted by your code.

👥 Who’s Affected: Mention who might be impacted (if applicable).

Screenshots

📸 If your changes modify documentation or a tutorial notebook, please include screenshots or GIFs showing the rendered outputs for a quicker initial review, highlighting the main changes.

Testing

🔍 Testing Done: Outline what kinds of tests you performed.

🔗 Test Case Link: Directly link to the most end-to-end check of your new functionality.

Unaddressed Cases

It's ok if your unit tests are not yet
comprehensive when you first open the PR,
we can revisit them later!

⚠️ Mention any aspects of testing that have not been covered, and why.

Links to Relevant Issues or Conversations

🔗 What Git or Slack items (Issues, threads, etc) that are specifically related to
this work? Please link them here.

References

📚 Include any extra information that may be helpful to reviewers of your
Pull-Request here (e.g. relevant URLs or Wiki pages that could help give
background information).

Share links, docs, or sources that facilitated your changes.

If relevant, please include additional code snippets
(and their outputs/return values) showing alternative ways to use your newly added methods.

[additional code snippets and explanations]

Reviewer Notes

💡 Include any specific points for the reviewer to consider during their review.

@huiwengoh huiwengoh requested a review from elisno February 8, 2024 13:58
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (6c1882b) 96.64% compared to head (a343ed2) 96.46%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #984      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.64%   96.46%   -0.18%     
==========================================
  Files          73       73              
  Lines        5716     5716              
  Branches     1022     1022              
==========================================
- Hits         5524     5514      -10     
- Misses        104      110       +6     
- Partials       88       92       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@elisno elisno merged commit f03cdd8 into cleanlab:master Feb 8, 2024
20 of 21 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants