Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add test checking that find_label_issues does not flag examples where given_label==prediction #778

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2023

Conversation

huiwengoh
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@huiwengoh huiwengoh requested a review from jwmueller July 21, 2023 22:31
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 21, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #778 (0e853ef) into master (dcd9ea3) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #778   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.44%   96.44%           
=======================================
  Files          60       60           
  Lines        4724     4724           
  Branches      821      821           
=======================================
  Hits         4556     4556           
  Misses         87       87           
  Partials       81       81           

Copy link
Member

@jwmueller jwmueller left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks this will be useful to have!
I was referring to add a stronger test of this via property-based testing, but this will suffice for now I think.

@jwmueller jwmueller merged commit d84d00e into cleanlab:master Jul 22, 2023
@huiwengoh huiwengoh deleted the find-label-issues-check branch July 27, 2023 20:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants