-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
Can't compile with new CheckPoint SDK (SHA256 support) #12
Comments
@carlopires Please let us know if you were able to compile this successfully. |
@carlopires @sumanar I need to double check, but the page SK110425 - OPSEC SDK - SHA-256 support mentions that:
I'll try switching to dynamic linking and let you know. |
This commit should fix issue #12 but people will no longer be able to build fw1-loggrabber using the old OPSEC SDK for Linux version 30.
Could you please test the above commit and let us know? |
Thank you @adepasquale fw1-loggrabber now compiles successfully with new OPSEC SDK! P.S.:
We can edit the line 4888 on fw1-loggrabber.c file as: Thank you. |
Thanks for your feedback. |
Hi @adepasquale - I checked the SK110425 - OPSEC SDK - SHA-256 support page and it has been updated since you posted on April 5. They now provide an example dependency list for static linking so it may be possible to statically link again. |
Is there any chance of you guys providing a statically build binary of fw1-loggrabber with the latest OPSEC SDK with SHA256 and TLS1.2 support? |
I'm sorry @mterron, for now you'll need to click the Check Point "Download Agreement" button yourself. |
I understand Andrea, maybe provide instructions to generate a static build then? The current instructions generate dynamically linked binaries. A OPSEC_LIB_DIR = $(OPSEC_PKG_DIR)/lib/release.static
OPSEC_LIBS = -lsicobj -lopsecext -lmastersapi -llogfilter -lfwsmtpobj -lfwadb -lCPMIClient501 -lCP_version_info -lCPMIBase501 -lopsec -lReg -lobjlib -lcpxerces_c -lCPStrings -lobjlibclient -lResolver -lcpprod50 -lCPSrvIS -lcplic_cntrct -lcpsic -lsicauth -lskey -lfwsetdb -lndb -lmessaging -lsic -lcp_policy -lcvars -lcpexpat -lcpca -lckpssl -lcpcert -lcpcryptutil -lEncode -lcpprng -lasn1cpp -lProdUtils -lcpbcrypt -lcpopenssl -lAppUtils -lComUtils -lResolve -lEventUtils -lDataStruct -lOS There are some warnings like:
|
When trying to compile fw1-loggrabber the new SDK with SHA256 support from CheckPoint I get a these errors:
Does anyone know how to circumvent this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: