Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(refactor) Context-based resolution for generic types #180

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Oct 19, 2024

Conversation

brentyi
Copy link
Owner

@brentyi brentyi commented Oct 19, 2024

Significant refactor for how we handle type parameters. This should be much easier to maintain and more robust. It also fixes a few edge cases, and adds tests to prevent regressions.

related: #177

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.71%. Comparing base (89ff57a) to head (f1ed7bc).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #180   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.71%   99.71%           
=======================================
  Files          25       25           
  Lines        2086     2117   +31     
=======================================
+ Hits         2080     2111   +31     
  Misses          6        6           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 99.71% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@brentyi brentyi changed the title Generics refactor (refactor) Context-based resolution for generic types Oct 19, 2024
@brentyi brentyi merged commit bd54f77 into main Oct 19, 2024
15 checks passed
@brentyi brentyi deleted the brent/generic_refactor branch October 19, 2024 19:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant