Transfer repository ownership to SciTools #167
Comments
|
Looking forward to this! Do you think we could have a checklist in the main issue body of what would make GeoVista "ready"? Should make it easier for us to hold ourselves to account. |
@trexfeathers Totally agree. I've have a ponder, and try to figure out the MVP for "readiness" to migrate. Fleshing that out to add realy clarity will give us something concrete to aim for, which is always a winner. Thanks! |
|
Bump |
|
@trexfeathers Thinking on this, I'm not going to create an exhaustive list here. I feel that would be a bit counter-productive. Also, at the moment the line in the sand is quite fluid, and I'm totally okay with that (for now). However, I am using the Also, I don't see the point in transferring ownership too soon, otherwise I can't be as nimble, reactive and productive as I am at the moment. Dunno, tough call. Ultimately, I think I'm relying on the fact that the decision of "when" will eventually become "clear", and I'm in no particular rush to force that decision along atm. |
|
@trexfeathers However, do keep nudging me. That should keep things healthy 😉 It's important that the migration happens 👍 |
|
This is probably a "perfect is the enemy of the good" situation. We have to make sure we recognise when GeoVista has passed the "good" threshold, and resist waiting for "perfect". |
|
In order to maintain a backlog of relevant issues, we automatically label them as stale after 180 days of inactivity. If this issue is still important to you, then please comment on this issue and the stale label will be removed. Otherwise this issue will be automatically closed in 28 days time. |
|
This issue is still important. |
|
In order to maintain a backlog of relevant issues, we automatically label them as stale after 180 days of inactivity. If this issue is still important to you, then please comment on this issue and the stale label will be removed. Otherwise this issue will be automatically closed in 28 days time. |
|
This issue is still important. |
📰 Custom Issue
It's early days for
geovista, which has just been born 🥳The current plan is to bootstrap
geovistahere with an minimal stable core under ownership of https://github.com/bjlittle, before then transferring ownership of the repository to the https://github.com/SciTools organisation.At the moment
SciToolsis slowly undergoing re-licensing from LGPL to BSD 3-Clause, and a refresh of its CLA. After this work is completed, and whengeovistais "ready" it will be migrated toSciToolsto live alongside its more mature and well-behaved sistercartopy.More importantly, once
geovistais underSciToolsownership, it can then be maintained by its awesome team of core developers 😄The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: