Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update sample app dependency to 2.15.0 #348

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 28, 2020
Merged

Update sample app dependency to 2.15.0 #348

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 28, 2020

Conversation

royjit
Copy link
Contributor

@royjit royjit commented Jul 28, 2020

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@royjit royjit requested a review from palpatim July 28, 2020 01:45
@royjit royjit merged commit 4ff6837 into main Jul 28, 2020
@royjit royjit deleted the UpdatedVersion branch July 28, 2020 15:49
@rromanchuk
Copy link

@royjit @palpatim @jamesonwilliams what are you thoughts, or would you be willing to accept/review a PR that included an additional sample directory like

aws-sdk-ios-samples/S3TransferUtility-Sample/Swift
aws-sdk-ios-samples/S3TransferUtility-Sample/Objective-C
aws-sdk-ios-samples/S3TransferUtility-Sample/Swift-without-amplify

It will implement the same project, but only in context of the SDK. It will have a separate README, with a warning and a link to redirect new users to amplify. I will volunteer to keep maintenance on it and feature parity. The amplification of this SDK is causing extremely useful information to get purged from the internet.

There is legitimate lower level SDK documentation that is being replaced with what is essentially a sales funnel.
262e3b2#diff-d7b2889057cb073970f5e2537a2e7468

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants