Flush the session between writing and deletion of RTIF (#42928) #43012
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* FLush the session before deleting the RTIF data Previously, this was how it was done, but now, a session was used for both the writing and deletion of RTIF, which we suspect caused StaleDataError. The related PR: apache#38565 This PR brings back the old behaviour of using different sessions for writing/deleting RTIFs * fixup! Use different sessions in writing and deletion of RTIF * add test and use flush (cherry picked from commit ced319f)
ephraimbuddy
force-pushed
the
fix-rtif-staledataerror2
branch
from
e01a288 to
fa0a084
Compare
kaxil
approved these changes
Oct 14, 2024
utkarsharma2
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 23, 2024
* FLush the session before deleting the RTIF data Previously, this was how it was done, but now, a session was used for both the writing and deletion of RTIF, which we suspect caused StaleDataError. The related PR: #38565 This PR brings back the old behaviour of using different sessions for writing/deleting RTIFs * fixup! Use different sessions in writing and deletion of RTIF * add test and use flush (cherry picked from commit ced319f)
utkarsharma2
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2024
* FLush the session before deleting the RTIF data Previously, this was how it was done, but now, a session was used for both the writing and deletion of RTIF, which we suspect caused StaleDataError. The related PR: #38565 This PR brings back the old behaviour of using different sessions for writing/deleting RTIFs * fixup! Use different sessions in writing and deletion of RTIF * add test and use flush (cherry picked from commit ced319f)
This was referenced Oct 28, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, this was how it was done, but now,
a session was used for both the writing and deletion of RTIF, which we suspect caused StaleDataError. The related PR: #38565
This PR brings back the old behaviour of using different sessions for writing/deleting RTIFs
fixup! Use different sessions in writing and deletion of RTIF
add test and use flush
(cherry picked from commit ced319f)
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.