Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ralph2 vs Ralph3 cross validator #2491

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 23, 2016

Conversation

mkurek
Copy link
Contributor

@mkurek mkurek commented Jun 21, 2016

MVP of data validator between ralph2 and ralph3. Currently it supports AssetModel and DataCenterAsset (partialy).

@mkurek mkurek force-pushed the ng-verification-mechanism-mk-2 branch from 6c6d41b to de0872f Compare June 21, 2016 08:46
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 21, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 84.533% when pulling de0872f on mkurek:ng-verification-mechanism-mk-2 into 32c26c4 on allegro:ng.



def main():
if 'cross_validator' not in os.environ.get('DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE', ''):
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this correct?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes - it is correct (but not perfect). the idea here is to enable local settings easily (ex. ralph.cross_validator.settings_local).

ar4s and others added 2 commits June 21, 2016 14:45
MVP of data validator between ralph2 and ralph3. Currently it supports AssetModel and DataCenterAsset (partialy).
@mkurek mkurek force-pushed the ng-verification-mechanism-mk-2 branch from de0872f to 8e5b5e7 Compare June 21, 2016 12:55
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 84.56% when pulling 8e5b5e7 on mkurek:ng-verification-mechanism-mk-2 into 2749439 on allegro:ng.

return format_html('-')
html = ''
for item, values in obj.diff.items():
print(item, values)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove print

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

http://flake8.pycqa.org/en/latest/extensions.html#existing-extensions
maybe we should use anh of them, especially flake8-print?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@xliiv #2492

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 22, 2016

🆗

@szok
Copy link
Contributor

szok commented Jun 22, 2016

🆗

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 84.56% when pulling d22efd0 on mkurek:ng-verification-mechanism-mk-2 into 2749439 on allegro:ng.

@mkurek mkurek merged commit a0aaf51 into allegro:ng Jun 23, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants