Univalence of slices #1457
Merged
Univalence of slices #1457
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
nmvdw
commented
Feb 13, 2022
nmvdw
commented
- Slice bicategory is univalent
- Adjoint equivalences in slice bicategory
- Slices from display map bicategory is univalent
- Adjoint equivalences in the slices coming from display map bicategories
umedaikiti
pushed a commit
to umedaikiti/UniMath
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2022
Univalence of slices
Skantz
pushed a commit
to Skantz/UniMath
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 12, 2022
Univalence of slices
Skantz
pushed a commit
to Skantz/UniMath
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 12, 2022
Univalence of slices
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.