Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Two reviewers for "opinionated" changes. #473

Merged

Conversation

samcunliffe
Copy link
Member

Following discussion, this would be a compromise resolution to #350.

As this could be controversial, I will add two reviewers. (cc @dstansby but I don't want to disturb your holiday)

@samcunliffe samcunliffe requested review from matt-graham and a team October 22, 2024 13:11
@samcunliffe samcunliffe linked an issue Oct 22, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Member

@paddyroddy paddyroddy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🫐

@paddyroddy paddyroddy added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation needs-2-reviewers Considered "controversial" so worth a second pair of eyes labels Oct 22, 2024
CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@samcunliffe samcunliffe requested a review from dstansby November 4, 2024 13:07
@samcunliffe samcunliffe changed the title Two reviewers for "controversial" changes. Two reviewers for "opinionated" changes. Nov 4, 2024
CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Collaborator

@matt-graham matt-graham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems all reasonable to me - have made a small suggestion to change one occurence of opinion changes to opinionated changes

@samcunliffe samcunliffe dismissed dstansby’s stale review November 6, 2024 20:37

Replaced "controversial" with "opinonated"

@samcunliffe samcunliffe enabled auto-merge (squash) November 6, 2024 20:37
@samcunliffe samcunliffe merged commit 642e42b into main Nov 6, 2024
13 checks passed
@samcunliffe samcunliffe deleted the 350-move-to-having-two-reviewers-for-pull-requests branch November 6, 2024 20:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation needs-2-reviewers Considered "controversial" so worth a second pair of eyes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Move to having two reviewers for pull requests?
4 participants