We need to add the way of passing the resource to components/templates to our convention, now it's either the resource name or simply resource

by the way the we will stick out to the resource name rather than simply resource ?

With templates in mind we could just add both, that's basically in line with how those variables were in the templates before.
With components, it makes meagre sense since it needs to be added as a live prop (probably will be ignored otherwise, though I have not checked), in that case, I'd go w/ the resource name (stuff like public ?Product $resource = null; etc. imo looks weird).

Either way we gotta talk it through and decide what's the better option.

Having the property accessor take care of these expressions would be great, then we could go

@=context.resource.isSimple

or just

@=context.resource.simple

I'll try to do it in Twig Hooks v0.3.

We really should reverse this merge, it looks weird having test attributes as the base.

Or we should a better way to add test form attributes :D.

Maybe we should add a global switch in the configuration regarding render_rest?