Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

pay-respects: 0.4.18 -> 0.6.10 #370422

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

pay-respects: 0.4.18 -> 0.6.10 #370422

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

SigmaSquadron
Copy link
Contributor

@SigmaSquadron SigmaSquadron commented Jan 2, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Split from #357425 at the request of @SimonYde (nix-community/home-manager#6257 (comment))

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@SigmaSquadron SigmaSquadron mentioned this pull request Jan 2, 2025
Merged
13 tasks
@lucasew
Copy link
Contributor

lucasew commented Jan 2, 2025

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 370422

x86_64-linux

⏩ 1 package marked as broken and skipped:
  • pidginPackages.tdlib-purple
✅ 9 packages built:
  • emacsPackages.telega
  • pay-respects
  • python312Packages.python-telegram
  • python312Packages.python-telegram.dist
  • python313Packages.python-telegram
  • python313Packages.python-telegram.dist
  • tdlib
  • tg
  • tg.dist

@SigmaSquadron
Copy link
Contributor Author

SigmaSquadron commented Jan 3, 2025 •
edited
Loading

⏩ 1 package marked as broken and skipped:
✅ 9 packages built:

What's telegram doing there? This package doesn't alter any of those.

@lucasew
Copy link
Contributor

lucasew commented Jan 3, 2025

⏩ 1 package marked as broken and skipped:
✅ 9 packages built:

What's telegram doing there?

Something is making nixpkgs-review stack diffs
Mic92/nixpkgs-review#446

@SigmaSquadron
Copy link
Contributor Author

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 370422

x86_64-linux

✅ 1 package built:
  • pay-respects

@lucasew
Copy link
Contributor

lucasew commented Jan 3, 2025

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 370422

x86_64-linux

✅ 1 package built:
  • pay-respects

@SigmaSquadron
pay-respects: 0.4.18 -> 0.6.10
1b6e894 
Signed-off-by: Fernando Rodrigues <alpha@sigmasquadron.net>
@SigmaSquadron SigmaSquadron changed the title pay-respects: 0.4.18 -> 0.6.8 pay-respects: 0.4.18 -> 0.6.10 Jan 12, 2025
@SigmaSquadron SigmaSquadron mentioned this pull request Jan 16, 2025
Merged
13 tasks
@SigmaSquadron
Copy link
Contributor Author

Superseded by #374279.

@SigmaSquadron SigmaSquadron deleted the push-mvtryzpouooo branch January 16, 2025 13:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@SigmaSquadron @lucasew