-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
moon: v1.5.1 #229867
moon: v1.5.1 #229867
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- Please create another commit that creates you as a maintainer in
maintainers/maintainer-list.nix
- Make that commit happen before your current one with message
maintainers: add flemzord
- Add the package to
pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix
- This adding should happen in the same commit as creating the package expression
- The commit message should say
moon: init at v1.4.0
So there should be 2 commits touching 3 files.
PS, I get an error trying to build (only parts of the output I think are relevant):
|
@flemzord are you still interested in this getting merged? Please reply before May 21st or I will unwatch this PR. |
After your most recent updates, the mentioned build error remains. |
Result of 1 package failed to build:
|
I just pushed a new version and it works for me locally on my Mac. |
Build on linux still fails for me, how did you build it there? |
@flemzord I tried to package this some time ago and IIRC |
@dit7ya I am not a Moon developer only a user On the NodeJS part, I think you're talking about proto? Which allows to manage dependencies? |
I am talking about the nodejs binary that moon uses to do anything. I just looked up and seems now they support the system node available on PATH. https://moonrepo.dev/docs/setup-toolchain#configuring-nodejs
|
fcb2721
to
0081416
Compare
Result of 1 package built:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In general looks good - just some nitpicks. Also, welcome to nixpkgs :).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
Result of 1 package built:
|
Description of changes
Things done
sandbox = true
set innix.conf
? (See Nix manual)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)