-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 147
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Erroneous NaN result from some (regression realized) performance calculations #279
Comments
…ns. Partial fix for #279 Signed-off-by: Niels Nuyttens <niels@nannyml.com>
Pushed a quick fix for regression right now. We'll have to comb through the other metrics for a quick check if the same issue applies there. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
Describe the bug
While working on an internal dataset the last chunk of data produced a
NaN
result formse
realized performance calculation.Calculating the performance manually resulted in a valid performance value number.
The culprit appears to be this line of code. This check and it's treatment shouldn't be there.
We should also check if this behavior happens on other performance metrics.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: