-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 119
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(par): add mover functionality to parallel capabilities #1427
Conversation
- split mover in provider,receiver parts
…into par-exg-mvr
- ncpus can now be set per simulation in testframework
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @mjr-deltares, this looks really nice, especially considering how difficult it seemed back when we first started talking about it. I see you've added the parallel test of the xmvr. Should we think about adding another test in the future for the bidirectional flow case?
Hi @langevin-usgs , good point! Let's try and put it in with this PR. I will set up something, might contact you offline. |
- fix printing of MVR table with qavailable in parallel
@langevin-usgs : I have included that test we talked about. Also sync'ed qavailable such that the MVR flow rates printed to the list file are correct. |
No description provided.