Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.60%. Comparing base (142353d) to head (3a8f027).
Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #307      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.31%   85.60%   +1.28%     
==========================================
  Files           8        9       +1     
  Lines         778      806      +28     
==========================================
+ Hits          656      690      +34     
+ Misses        122      116       -6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Note that there is also "test/Project.toml".

Hmmm, looks like I might need to make a patch release to the compat version of StyledStrings to improve the behaviour when precompiled within another package.

Yup, I'll do a 1.0.1 release shortly: see JuliaLang/StyledStrings.jl@dc94cfa

I will merge PR #308 first to make it easier to see the CI results. (Edit: Merged)
(The problem on ARM is expected to be resolved with FixedPointNumbers v0.8.5.)
Also, I believe Dependabot will be creating a PR in a couple of days, but it is not a priority.

Cool, I'd thought I'd have 1.0.1 out by now, but there seems to be a holdup to do with the casing of juialang in the repo. I'll update this PR once that's resolved.

This is off-topic and outside my scope of responsibility, but what is the review process and accountability of StyledStrings.jl?
Committing without PR deprives us of the opportunity to review.
Of course, GitHub allows people to comment on commits, but that goes unnoticed by most people.

The way StyledStrings.jl is setup: Commits to Main go through PRs, always, even for small fixup commits that really don't need it. Commits to other branches (like julia1-compat) can just be pushed.

Currently, I'm hoping that other people will get involved with this, but it's pretty much a just-me show ATM. Given that, the review process is "I think it looks good".

The failing tests are from:

• RGB24/ARGB32 constructors
• transparent gray constructors

I don't see why not, or why it was added in the first place?

why it was added in the first place?

Because, as you know, julia1-compat didn't work before.