Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compatibility with GCP deployment manager #3685

Closed
bgrant0607 opened this issue Jan 21, 2015 · 7 comments
Closed

Compatibility with GCP deployment manager #3685

bgrant0607 opened this issue Jan 21, 2015 · 7 comments
Labels
area/api Indicates an issue on api area. area/app-lifecycle area/kubectl area/platform/gce area/usability kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release.

Comments

@bgrant0607
Copy link
Member

We could also build a simplified open-source version.

https://cloud.google.com/deployment-manager/fundamentals

One useful functionality it would add is parameterization, using jinja templates and sandboxed python.

Known issues:

@bgrant0607 bgrant0607 added area/api Indicates an issue on api area. area/app-lifecycle area/usability area/platform/gce area/kubectl priority/awaiting-more-evidence Lowest priority. Possibly useful, but not yet enough support to actually get it done. labels Jan 21, 2015
@roberthbailey roberthbailey added the sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. label Feb 18, 2015
@bgrant0607 bgrant0607 added sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. and removed sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. labels Feb 28, 2015
@bgrant0607
Copy link
Member Author

cc @jackgr @iantw89

@bgrant0607 bgrant0607 added team/ux and removed sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. labels Sep 18, 2015
@DamodarSojka
Copy link

Hi
I am a student at University of Edinburgh currently involved in undergraduate research project concerned with configuring large systems. I am faced with prototype of new configuration language, and my task is to understand common problems that exist in area of configuring large systems. I want to track down problems that existing solutions are not solving and hopefully make useful proposals to prototype language. For example now I am looking at google's App Engine approach to configuration in order to figure out what are the useful features and how they can be implemented in more declarative approach, but in order to pick such features I would need to receive either feedback or data, like existing code for configurations. Is this possible? If I have asked in a wrong place please let me know where I can go.

@bgrant0607 bgrant0607 added priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. and removed priority/awaiting-more-evidence Lowest priority. Possibly useful, but not yet enough support to actually get it done. labels Oct 1, 2015
@bgrant0607
Copy link
Member Author

cc @vaikas

@errordeveloper
Copy link
Member

@DamodarSojka please post on StackOverflow or the Kubernetes mailing list, this is a good question indeed and Kubernetes may well be the right kind of system to study.

@jackgr
Copy link
Contributor

jackgr commented Nov 5, 2015

We've just pushed the initial bits for open source Deployment Manager. See the new repository here. @DamodarSojka, we would welcome your involvement and review.

@jackgr
Copy link
Contributor

jackgr commented Nov 29, 2015

Note that we don't yet sandbox the python or wait for readiness of dependencies #1899, although both features are in the backlog.

Can this issue be closed, now?

cc @bgrant0607

@DamodarSojka
Copy link

Yes. Thanks!

On 29 November 2015 at 22:37, Jack Greenfield notifications@github.com
wrote:

Note that we don't yet sandbox the python or wait for readiness of
dependencies #1899 #1899,
although both features are in the backlog.

Can this issue be closed, now?

cc @bgrant0607 https://github.com/bgrant0607


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#3685 (comment)
.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/api Indicates an issue on api area. area/app-lifecycle area/kubectl area/platform/gce area/usability kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants