-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 409
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support $comment
query operator
#563
Conversation
$comment
query operator
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #563 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 61.63% 61.40% -0.23%
==========================================
Files 121 121
Lines 6782 6820 +38
==========================================
+ Hits 4180 4188 +8
- Misses 2085 2110 +25
- Partials 517 522 +5
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If protoFetch
is ok, then let's ad remove old fetch
and rename protoFetch
to fetch
.
We cannot have 2 functions: it's misleading and complicates things.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
protoFetch
looks good, let's replace existing fetch
with it
2671274
to
48ea3e4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please resolve merge conflicts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ribaraka would you please resolve conflicts
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
Closes #168.