-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 409
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement createIndexes
for unique indexes
#2814
Implement createIndexes
for unique indexes
#2814
Conversation
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2814 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 63.73% 63.77% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 448 448
Lines 22818 22890 +72
==========================================
+ Hits 14542 14598 +56
- Misses 7316 7334 +18
+ Partials 960 958 -2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
@w84thesun this pull request has merge conflicts. |
# Conflicts: # integration/indexes_compat_test.go
# Conflicts: # integration/indexes_compat_test.go
createIndexes
for unique indexes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great!
Is this case handled? The data is from task
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So many edge cases with unique index creation 😮
My main comments are just testing error messages, others are not so important.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great work!
@w84thesun this pull request has merge conflicts. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM (There are some merge conflicts to resolve)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM overall. I have a couple of minor points, but I suggest we leave them for now to get the task done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Description
Closes #2045.
Readiness checklist
task all
, and it passed.@FerretDB/core
), Labels, Project and project's Sprint fields.