Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding Impression Pixel #4479

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 5, 2019
Merged

Conversation

scbedd
Copy link
Member

@scbedd scbedd commented Mar 4, 2019

Peter and co want to be able to see distribution of viewership in the context of all this Track 2 work we're doing.

Adding an impression pixel is the only way currently that github can't curtail.

@Azure/azure-sdk-eng

@adxsdk6
Copy link

adxsdk6 commented Mar 4, 2019

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

1 similar comment
@adxsdk6
Copy link

adxsdk6 commented Mar 4, 2019

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@scbedd scbedd changed the title Adding Impression PIxel Adding Impression Pixel Mar 4, 2019
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #4479 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #4479   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   53.38%   53.38%           
=======================================
  Files       10458    10458           
  Lines      219467   219467           
=======================================
  Hits       117155   117155           
  Misses     102312   102312

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2f3c79e...7d097de. Read the comment docs.

@scbedd scbedd merged commit 7e0d502 into Azure:master Mar 5, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants