Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Azure ML Local Endpoint CODEOWNERS #26637

Merged

Conversation

JustinFirsching
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Update CODEOWNERS to reflect recent ownership change of Azure ML Local Endpoints subdirectory.

All SDK Contribution checklist:

  • The pull request does not introduce [breaking changes]
  • CHANGELOG is updated for new features, bug fixes or other significant changes.
  • I have read the contribution guidelines.

General Guidelines and Best Practices

  • Title of the pull request is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For more information on cleaning up the commits in your PR, see this page.

Testing Guidelines

  • Pull request includes test coverage for the included changes.

@jsquire
Copy link
Member

jsquire commented Oct 5, 2022

/check-enforcer override

@jsquire jsquire merged commit 2a445fe into Azure:main Oct 5, 2022
jsquire added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2022
# Summary

The focus of these changes is to capture updates to CODEOWNERS for service owners and new PR paths/labels.

# Related

- #26637
- #26644
- #26574
jsquire added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2022
# Summary

The focus of these changes is to capture updates to CODEOWNERS for service owners and new PR paths/labels.

# Related

- #26637
- #26644
- #26574
@JustinFirsching JustinFirsching deleted the jfirsching/local_endpoints_codeowners branch October 11, 2022 18:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants