Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open avb next #789

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 7, 2018
Merged

Open avb next #789

merged 7 commits into from
Jun 7, 2018

Conversation

andrew-elder
Copy link

Maintenance merge....

freddeng and others added 7 commits April 18, 2018 22:51
A object of pdelay_req is managed(create&delete) at ethe_port.
but it also could be deleted at a step for processing of pdelay_resp.
Thus, there is a race condition.

Those sequence should be deleted for some reasons below:
1. If pdelay_req is trigged in the middle of processing pdelay_resp, then 'null point exception' could be happened.
2. The available pdelay_req would(should) be kept until sending next pdelay_req. Becuase it is possible to receive correct pdelay_resp even after unexpected error at processing pdelay_rest.
gptp : remove unnecessary sequence that try to delete pdelay request object.
PDelayRequest seqId was used as PDelayRespFollowUp seqId.
Fix the dead lock when handling SYNC_RECEIPT_TIMEOUT_EXPIRES event
@andrew-elder andrew-elder merged commit df587b7 into master Jun 7, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants