Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Copybook without 01 or root record #396

Closed
ghost opened this issue Jul 2, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Copybook without 01 or root record #396

ghost opened this issue Jul 2, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
accepted Accepted for implementation enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 2, 2021 •
edited by ghost
Loading

Background

Though root record with 01 level is mandatory, can cobrix handle copybook without 01 level

Feature

Having feature where cobrix can read copybook without root or 01 level. It would check the presence of 01 record and if it's not available then it should consider as ignoring the root level like the schema_retention_policy to collapse_root. If user has provided schema retention policy to collapse_root then even if root record is not available still we should consider the root record as implicit and not to fail the code.

Proposed Solution [Optional]

Solution Ideas
1.
2.
3.
@ghost ghost added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 2, 2021
@yruslan yruslan added the accepted Accepted for implementation label Jul 8, 2021
@yruslan
Copy link
Collaborator

yruslan commented Jul 8, 2021

Thanks for raising the issue! I had exactly the same idea :)

We are going to implement it exactly like this.

yruslan added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 28, 2022
@yruslan
#396 Implement support for parsing copybooks that do not have a root …
0582786 
…record GROUP.
yruslan added a commit that referenced this issue May 3, 2022
@yruslan
#396 Implement support for parsing copybooks that do not have a root …
6b71a0b 
…record GROUP.
@yruslan yruslan closed this as completed Aug 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
accepted Accepted for implementation enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@yruslan