The possible implementation of stemming with Spylls is demonstrated in this discussion: #19 (comment)

I'll gladly accept a PR that will make it more convenient, but unfortunately don't have time to work on this myself

As I have tested with word wrote , it is not accurate

That just depends on the dictionary.

In the standard en-US dictionary, wrote is specified as a separate word form (like most of irregular verbs, I guess). Note that hunspell and its dictionaries are designed, first and foremost, as a spell-checking tool, not a full-fledged linguistic analysis package.

I tested with https://github.com/cdhigh/chunspell
it worked as expected

Please show which Hunspell dictionaries you have used with both, and what was the code you have tried.

For chunspell, by default you have the only en_US dictionaries available. --https://github.com/cdhigh/chunspell?tab=readme-ov-file#dictionaries

from hunspell import Hunspell
hunSpell = Hunspell()
print(hunSpell.stem('wrote'))#gives ('write', 'wrote')

With spylls, I used the code you gave at the comment section #19 (comment)

from spylls.hunspell import Dictionary
# en_US dictionary is distributed with spylls
# See docs to load other dictionaries
dictionary = Dictionary.from_files('en_US')
from spylls.hunspell.algo.capitalization import Type as CapType

for form in dictionary.lookuper.affix_forms('wrote', captype=CapType.NO): 
  print(form.stem))#only gives 'wrote'