Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

What's the best performance of this code? #85

Open
gorgeousyouth opened this issue Nov 30, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

What's the best performance of this code? #85

gorgeousyouth opened this issue Nov 30, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@gorgeousyouth
Copy link

excuse me , i get the model by using the code , but i can not get the score in the paper,can you tell me the reason
@weicheng51
Copy link

Bleu_1: 0.639145
Bleu_2: 0.424485
Bleu_3: 0.283304
Bleu_4: 0.192496
METEOR: 0.203724
ROUGE_L: 0.503118
CIDEr: 0.584677

@weicheng51
Copy link

the result of my training is far from the one published in the paper

@shiqi1994
Copy link

the result of my training is far from the one published in the paper

I got the same results which indeed far away from the results in the paper. And I do not know why:(

@takagi97
Copy link

I imitated this code and wrote a Pytorch-based version, and used Resnet101 to extract features, only to get a score close to that in the paper.
ratio: 1.01423555697
Bleu_1: 0.708868328298
Bleu_2: 0.50652071489
Bleu_3: 0.359143843477
Bleu_4: 0.254603597177
METEOR: 0.231556508619

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@shiqi1994 @weicheng51 @gorgeousyouth @takagi97