Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

I used hasSize(100) expecting the validation to be at most 100 characters long which isn't what's happening though.
The function is defined as:
hasSize(min: Int = Int.MIN_VALUE, max: Int = Int.MAX_VALUE)
which translates to hasSize(100, Int.MAX_VALUE).

Describe the solution you'd like

I think there should be a one parameter function hasSize(size: Int) to prevent these misunderstandings and the two parameter function should not have default values for min/max.

• hasSize(size: Int) -> matches exact size / length
• hasSize(min: Int, max: Int) -> matches size in [min, max]

Describe alternatives you've considered

To be even clearer with the intention I suggest:

• hasSize(size: Int) -> matches exact size / length
• hasSize(range: IntRange) -> matches size defined by IntRange