-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 714
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: trd104: fix pointer->parameter #4299
Conversation
Huh, let's see whether re-opening fixes this LiteX test fluke. |
@bradjc Can you bump the draft version of this? |
I believe that referring to the "appdata" in subscribe as an "application data pointer" is unintentional, and that it should be "application data parameter" to match the earlier description. I believe this stems from userspace largely using that parameter to store a pointer, but we don't require that (and can't enforce it). This clarifies the document.
6b0fdad
to
a31b20b
Compare
@lschuermann looks like something weird with litex still? |
Ever since I switched it to use the MLFQ scheduler it's been failing pretty non-deterministically. This is definitely something we should investigate, I think chances are that it's actually something related to MLFQ. |
Should we mark litex as a non-required status check until the MLFQ issue is resolved? |
Done. |
Pull Request Overview
I believe that referring to the "appdata" in subscribe as an "application data pointer" in TRD104 is unintentional, and that it should be "application data parameter" to match the earlier description. I believe this stems from userspace largely using that parameter to store a pointer, but we don't require that (and can't enforce it). This clarifies the document.
Testing Strategy
docs
TODO or Help Wanted
n/a
Documentation Updated
/docs
, or no updates are required.Formatting
make prepush
.