add publish test result #11
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This is an experiment review for experiment Experiment configurationreview_config:
# User configuration for the review
# - benchmark - use the user config from the benchmark reviews
# - <value> - use the value directly
user_review_config:
enable_ai_review: true
enable_rule_comments: false
enable_complexity_comments: benchmark
enable_security_comments: benchmark
enable_tests_comments: benchmark
enable_comment_suggestions: benchmark
enable_functionality_review: benchmark
enable_pull_request_summary: benchmark
enable_review_guide: benchmark
enable_approvals: true
ai_review_config:
# The model responses to use for the experiment
# - benchmark - use the model responses from the benchmark reviews
# - llm - call the language model to generate responses
model_responses:
comments_model: llm
comment_area_model: llm
comment_validation_model: llm
comment_suggestion_model: llm
complexity_model: llm
docstrings_model: llm
functionality_model: llm
security_model: llm
tests_model: llm
pull_request_summary_model: llm
review_guide_model: llm
documentation_model: llm
overall_comments_model: llm
# The pull request dataset to run the experiment on
pull_request_dataset:
- https://github.com/mraniki/iamlistening/pull/334
- https://github.com/mraniki/cefi/pull/475
- https://github.com/mraniki/MyLLM/pull/581
- https://github.com/mraniki/dxsp/pull/689
- https://github.com/jschalk/jaar/pull/239
- https://github.com/jschalk/jaar/pull/241
- https://github.com/jschalk/jaar/pull/242
- https://github.com/iptux-src/iptux/pull/620
- https://github.com/iptux-src/iptux/pull/622
- https://github.com/hacksider/Deep-Live-Cam/pull/46
- https://github.com/mnbf9rca/super_simple_tfl_status/pull/114
- https://github.com/mnbf9rca/super_simple_tfl_status/pull/115
- https://github.com/RockProfile/Django-deployment/pull/1
- https://github.com/hbmartin/graphviz2drawio/pull/83
- https://github.com/fairdataihub/codefair-app/pull/28
- https://github.com/totaldebug/atomic-calendar-revive/pull/1518
- https://github.com/iammiracle01/portfolio/pull/1
- https://github.com/iammiracle01/portfolio/pull/2
- https://github.com/iammiracle01/portfolio/pull/3
- https://github.com/supermario-ai/gpt-crawler/pull/1
- https://github.com/hbmartin/graphviz2drawio/pull/84
- https://github.com/hbmartin/graphviz2drawio/pull/85
- https://github.com/dreamerminsk/tasked/pull/85
- https://github.com/dreamerminsk/tasked/pull/86
- https://github.com/dreamerminsk/tasked/pull/84
- https://github.com/haalasz/fm-tools/pull/9
- https://github.com/haalasz/fm-tools/pull/10
- https://github.com/iptux-src/iptux/pull/619
- https://github.com/code-Harsh247/medsymptom/pull/1
- https://github.com/code-Harsh247/medsymptom/pull/2
- https://github.com/cpp-lln-lab/bidspm/pull/1263
- https://github.com/cpp-lln-lab/bidspm/pull/1264
- https://github.com/cpp-lln-lab/bidspm/pull/1265
- https://github.com/luiscarlop/Judge_AI/pull/22
- https://github.com/NoNormalCreeper/nonebot_plugin_wolfram/pull/6
- https://github.com/osama1998H/kalima/pull/39
- https://github.com/osama1998H/kalima/pull/40
- https://github.com/osama1998H/kalima/pull/41
- https://github.com/jackdewinter/pymarkdown/pull/1131
- https://github.com/Eliver-Salazar/PED/pull/12
- https://github.com/NextAlone/Nagram/pull/40
- https://github.com/strawberry-graphql/strawberry-django/pull/575
- https://github.com/strawberry-graphql/strawberry/pull/3558
- https://github.com/strawberry-graphql/strawberry/pull/3559
- https://github.com/Ruin2121/yahooquery/pull/9
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/gdsfactory/pull/2951
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/gdsfactory/pull/2954
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/gdsfactory/pull/2956
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/gdsfactory/pull/2957
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/cspdk/pull/51
review_comment_labels:
- label: correct
question: Is this comment correct?
- label: helpful
question: Is this comment helpful?
- label: comment-type
question: Is the comment type correct?
- label: comment-area
question: Is the comment area correct?
- label: llm-test
question: |
What type of LLM test could this comment become?
- 👍 - this comment is really good/important and we should always make it
- 👎 - this comment is really bad and we should never make it
- no reaction - don't turn this comment into an LLM test
# Benchmark reviews generated by running
# python -m scripts.experiment benchmark <experiment_name>
benchmark_reviews:
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/mraniki/iamlistening/pull/334
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/iamlistening/pull/35
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/mraniki/cefi/pull/475
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/cefi/pull/36
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/mraniki/MyLLM/pull/581
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/MyLLM/pull/4
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/mraniki/dxsp/pull/689
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/dxsp/pull/14
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/iptux-src/iptux/pull/620
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/iptux/pull/4
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/iptux-src/iptux/pull/622
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/iptux/pull/5
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/hacksider/Deep-Live-Cam/pull/46
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/Deep-Live-Cam/pull/2
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/mnbf9rca/super_simple_tfl_status/pull/114
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/super_simple_tfl_status/pull/1
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/mnbf9rca/super_simple_tfl_status/pull/115
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/super_simple_tfl_status/pull/2
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/hbmartin/graphviz2drawio/pull/83
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/graphviz2drawio/pull/1
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/iammiracle01/portfolio/pull/1
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/portfolio/pull/2
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/iammiracle01/portfolio/pull/2
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/portfolio/pull/1
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/iammiracle01/portfolio/pull/3
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/portfolio/pull/3
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/supermario-ai/gpt-crawler/pull/1
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/gpt-crawler/pull/1
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/hbmartin/graphviz2drawio/pull/84
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/graphviz2drawio/pull/2
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/dreamerminsk/tasked/pull/86
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/tasked/pull/14
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/dreamerminsk/tasked/pull/84
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/tasked/pull/15
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/haalasz/fm-tools/pull/9
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/fm-tools/pull/2
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/haalasz/fm-tools/pull/10
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/fm-tools/pull/3
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/iptux-src/iptux/pull/619
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/iptux/pull/6
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/code-Harsh247/medsymptom/pull/1
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/medsymptom/pull/1
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/code-Harsh247/medsymptom/pull/2
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/medsymptom/pull/2
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/NoNormalCreeper/nonebot_plugin_wolfram/pull/6
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/nonebot_plugin_wolfram/pull/1
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/osama1998H/kalima/pull/39
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/kalima/pull/1
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/osama1998H/kalima/pull/40
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/kalima/pull/2
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/osama1998H/kalima/pull/41
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/kalima/pull/3
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/jackdewinter/pymarkdown/pull/1131
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/pymarkdown/pull/9
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/Eliver-Salazar/PED/pull/12
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/PED/pull/3
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/NextAlone/Nagram/pull/40
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/Nagram/pull/1
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/strawberry-graphql/strawberry-django/pull/575
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/strawberry-django/pull/2
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/strawberry-graphql/strawberry/pull/3558
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/strawberry/pull/13
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/strawberry-graphql/strawberry/pull/3559
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/strawberry/pull/14
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/Ruin2121/yahooquery/pull/9
review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/yahooquery/pull/1
|
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request enhances the CI workflow by adding permissions for checks and pull-requests in the codecov job, upgrading the Codecov action to v4, and integrating a new action to publish test results from 'build/meson-logs/testlog.junit.xml'. These changes aim to improve the CI process by ensuring proper permissions, using the latest Codecov version, and providing more detailed test result information. File-Level Changes
Tips
|
SourceryAI
approved these changes
Jul 8, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @Hellebore - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟡 Security: 1 issue found
- 🟡 Testing: 1 issue found
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
Comment on lines
+76
to
+78
| permissions: | ||
| checks: write | ||
| pull-requests: write |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🚨 suggestion (security): Consider the principle of least privilege for CI permissions
While adding permissions is necessary for certain actions, it's important to ensure we're not granting more access than required. Could we narrow down the scope of these permissions or use more specific ones if available?
Suggested change
| permissions: | |
| checks: write | |
| pull-requests: write | |
| permissions: | |
| checks: read | |
| pull-requests: write | |
| statuses: write |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What type of LLM test could this comment become?
- 👍 - this comment is really good/important and we should always make it
- 👎 - this comment is really bad and we should never make it
- no reaction - don't turn this comment into an LLM test
Comment on lines
+110
to
+116
| - name: "Publish Test Results" | ||
| uses: mikepenz/action-junit-report@v4 | ||
| if: always() | ||
| with: | ||
| report_paths: build/meson-logs/testlog.junit.xml | ||
| include_passed: true | ||
| detailed_summary: true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (testing): Consider conditional execution of test result publishing
The 'if: always()' ensures this step runs even if previous steps fail, which is good for visibility. However, you might want to consider making this conditional on the presence of test results to avoid potential errors if the file doesn't exist.
Suggested change
| - name: "Publish Test Results" | |
| uses: mikepenz/action-junit-report@v4 | |
| if: always() | |
| with: | |
| report_paths: build/meson-logs/testlog.junit.xml | |
| include_passed: true | |
| detailed_summary: true | |
| - name: "Publish Test Results" | |
| uses: mikepenz/action-junit-report@v4 | |
| if: always() && hashFiles('build/meson-logs/testlog.junit.xml') != '' | |
| with: | |
| report_paths: build/meson-logs/testlog.junit.xml | |
| include_passed: true | |
| detailed_summary: true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What type of LLM test could this comment become?
- 👍 - this comment is really good/important and we should always make it
- 👎 - this comment is really bad and we should never make it
- no reaction - don't turn this comment into an LLM test
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary by Sourcery
This pull request enhances the CI workflow by updating the Codecov integration and introducing test result publishing. It improves the visibility of test outcomes and coverage reports, which can help in maintaining code quality and identifying issues more efficiently.