🟡(change): cache organization response #11

sourcery-ai-experiments-bot · 2024-07-24T00:19:30Z

Organization is pulled quite a bit from the application, but should not be updated often.

Summary by Sourcery

This pull request introduces caching for organization data using Redis, removes the rainbow animation feature from the theme provider, and consolidates organization-related API endpoints and hooks. Additionally, it updates dependencies to include the new Redis client library.

New Features:
- Introduced caching for organization data using Redis to reduce database load and improve response times.
Enhancements:
- Removed the rainbow animation feature from the theme provider and related components.
- Consolidated organization-related API endpoints and hooks for better consistency and maintainability.
Chores:
- Updated dependencies in go.mod to include new Redis client library.

sourcery-ai-experiments-bot · 2024-07-24T00:19:32Z

This is a benchmark review for experiment review_of_reviews_20240724.
Run ID: review_of_reviews_20240724/benchmark_2024-07-24T00-19-03_v1-21-0-35-g39686f12d.

This pull request was cloned from https://github.com/emoss08/Trenova/pull/275. (Note: the URL is not a link to avoid triggering a notification on the original pull request.)

Experiment configuration

review_config:
  # User configuration for the review
  # - benchmark - use the user config from the benchmark reviews
  # - <value> - use the value directly
  user_review_config:
    enable_ai_review: true
    enable_rule_comments: false

    enable_complexity_comments: benchmark
    enable_security_comments: benchmark
    enable_tests_comments: benchmark
    enable_comment_suggestions: benchmark
    enable_functionality_review: benchmark

    enable_pull_request_summary: benchmark
    enable_review_guide: benchmark

    enable_approvals: true

  ai_review_config:
    # The model responses to use for the experiment
    # - benchmark - use the model responses from the benchmark reviews
    # - llm - call the language model to generate responses
    model_responses:
      comments_model: benchmark
      comment_area_model: benchmark
      comment_validation_model: benchmark
      comment_suggestion_model: benchmark
      complexity_model: benchmark
      docstrings_model: benchmark
      functionality_model: benchmark
      security_model: benchmark
      tests_model: benchmark
      pull_request_summary_model: benchmark
      review_guide_model: benchmark

# The pull request dataset to run the experiment on
pull_request_dataset:
- https://github.com/kloudlite/web/pull/255
- https://github.com/kloudlite/helm-charts/pull/111
- https://github.com/womboai/edge-optimization-subnet/pull/2
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/gdsfactory/pull/3016
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/gplugins/pull/447
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/gdsfactory/pull/3017
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/kfactory/pull/435
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/kfactory/pull/436
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/gdsfactory/pull/3018
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/gdsfactory/pull/3020
- https://github.com/emoss08/Trenova/pull/275
- https://github.com/open-data/oc_search/pull/34
- https://github.com/albumentations-team/albumentations/pull/1854
- https://github.com/TeamKillerX/RyuzakiLib/pull/53
- https://github.com/nikhilbadyal/docker-py-revanced/pull/540
- https://github.com/Jaycelab/Jaycelab/pull/2
- https://github.com/Awesome-RJ/Skynet-System/pull/4
- https://github.com/hbmartin/overcast-to-sqlite/pull/28
- https://github.com/electionscience/vote.electionscience.org/pull/207
- https://github.com/electionscience/vote.electionscience.org/pull/208
- https://github.com/electionscience/vote.electionscience.org/pull/209
- https://github.com/szw0407/Bypass-SDU-Unified-Identity-Authentication-Platform-Device-Chesk/pull/1
- https://github.com/mnbf9rca/pydantic_tfl_api/pull/55
- https://github.com/mnbf9rca/pydantic_tfl_api/pull/56
- https://github.com/mnbf9rca/pydantic_tfl_api/pull/57
- https://github.com/mnbf9rca/pydantic_tfl_api/pull/58
- https://github.com/mnbf9rca/pydantic_tfl_api/pull/59
- https://github.com/mnbf9rca/pydantic_tfl_api/pull/61
- https://github.com/mnbf9rca/pydantic_tfl_api/pull/62
- https://github.com/mnbf9rca/pydantic_tfl_api/pull/63
- https://github.com/mnbf9rca/pydantic_tfl_api/pull/64
- https://github.com/mnbf9rca/pydantic_tfl_api/pull/67
- https://github.com/mnbf9rca/pydantic_tfl_api/pull/68
- https://github.com/mnbf9rca/pydantic_tfl_api/pull/69
- https://github.com/mnbf9rca/pydantic_tfl_api/pull/60
- https://github.com/ToolDelta/PluginMarket/pull/9
- https://github.com/duyet/clickhouse-monitoring/pull/313
- https://github.com/duyet/clickhouse-monitoring/pull/315
- https://github.com/duyet/clickhouse-monitoring/pull/314
- https://github.com/hasansezertasan/openapipages/pull/27
- https://github.com/dan5e3s6ares/a-real-mock-api/pull/7
- https://github.com/4DNucleome/PartSeg/pull/1165
- https://github.com/4DNucleome/PartSeg/pull/1166
- https://github.com/4DNucleome/PartSeg/pull/1167
- https://github.com/4DNucleome/PartSeg/pull/1168
- https://github.com/EspenAlbert/atlas-init/pull/17
- https://github.com/jschalk/jaar/pull/278
- https://github.com/jschalk/jaar/pull/279
- https://github.com/jschalk/jaar/pull/280
- https://github.com/bitcashorg/smartsale/pull/282
review_comment_labels:
- label: correct
  question: Is this comment correct?
- label: helpful
  question: Is this comment helpful?
- label: comment-type
  question: Is the comment type correct?
- label: comment-area
  question: Is the comment area correct?
- label: llm-test
  question: |
    What type of LLM test could this comment become?
    - 👍 - this comment is really good/important and we should always make it
    - 👎 - this comment is really bad and we should never make it
    - no reaction - don't turn this comment into an LLM test

# Benchmark reviews generated by running
#   python -m scripts.experiment benchmark <experiment_name>
benchmark_reviews: []

SourceryAI · 2024-07-24T00:19:35Z

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request introduces caching for organization data using Redis, removes the rainbow animation feature from the theme provider, and consolidates organization-related API endpoints and hooks. Additionally, it updates dependencies to include the Redis client library.

File-Level Changes

Files	Changes
`internal/api/services/organization.service.go` `internal/server/server.go` `pkg/redis/client.go`	Introduced Redis caching for organization data, including client initialization and cache management methods.
`web/frontend/src/components/ui/theme-provider.tsx` `web/frontend/src/components/layout/user-avatar-menu.tsx` `web/frontend/src/components/layout/topbar.tsx`	Removed the rainbow animation feature from the theme provider and related components.
`web/frontend/src/hooks/useQueries.ts` `web/frontend/src/services/OrganizationRequestService.ts` `web/frontend/src/components/layout/logo.tsx` `web/frontend/src/pages/admin/Dashboard.tsx`	Consolidated organization-related API endpoints and hooks to streamline data fetching and handling.

Tips

Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments.
You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your dashboard:
- Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide;
- Change the review language;
You can always contact us if you have any questions or feedback.

SourceryAI

Hey @sourcery-ai-experiments-bot - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

Consider encapsulating repetitive error-handling patterns for Redis operations into utility functions to make the code cleaner.
There is a minor typo in the comment: 'Try toi fetch the organization from the cache.' It should be 'Try to fetch the organization from the cache.'
The removal of the rainbow animation feature is a good cleanup, but it would be helpful to mention why this feature was removed in the PR description.

Here's what I looked at during the review

🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
🟢 Security: all looks good
🟢 Testing: all looks good
🟢 Complexity: all looks good
🟢 Documentation: all looks good

LangSmith trace

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.}

SourceryAI · 2024-07-24T00:20:49Z

pkg/models/organization.go

+func (o *Organization) UnmarshalBinary(data []byte) error {
+	return sonic.Unmarshal(data, o)
+}
+
+func (o *Organization) MarshalBinary() ([]byte, error) {


suggestion (performance): Use of sonic for JSON marshalling

The use of the sonic library for JSON marshalling and unmarshalling is fine, but ensure that it is thoroughly tested for performance and compatibility with your existing data structures.

Is this comment correct?

Is this comment helpful?

Is the comment type correct?

Is the comment area correct?

What type of LLM test could this comment become?

👍 - this comment is really good/important and we should always make it

👎 - this comment is really bad and we should never make it

no reaction - don't turn this comment into an LLM test

emoss08 added 5 commits July 22, 2024 16:44

✅(add): redis client

7b4b7dd

🟡(change): remove redundant organization handler

dc048f8

🍪(chore): cleanup

028850d

🍪(chore): format

f845047

🟡(change): redis client params

ad109ab

SourceryAI approved these changes Jul 24, 2024

View reviewed changes

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

🟡(change): cache organization response #11

🟡(change): cache organization response #11

sourcery-ai-experiments-bot commented Jul 24, 2024 •

edited by SourceryAI

Loading

sourcery-ai-experiments-bot commented Jul 24, 2024

SourceryAI commented Jul 24, 2024 •

edited

Loading

SourceryAI left a comment

SourceryAI Jul 24, 2024

SourceryAI Jul 24, 2024

SourceryAI Jul 24, 2024

SourceryAI Jul 24, 2024

SourceryAI Jul 24, 2024

SourceryAI Jul 24, 2024

🟡(change): cache organization response #11

Are you sure you want to change the base?

🟡(change): cache organization response #11

Conversation

sourcery-ai-experiments-bot commented Jul 24, 2024 • edited by SourceryAI Loading

Summary by Sourcery

sourcery-ai-experiments-bot commented Jul 24, 2024

SourceryAI commented Jul 24, 2024 • edited Loading

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

File-Level Changes

SourceryAI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

SourceryAI Jul 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

SourceryAI Jul 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

SourceryAI Jul 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

SourceryAI Jul 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

SourceryAI Jul 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

SourceryAI Jul 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

sourcery-ai-experiments-bot commented Jul 24, 2024 •

edited by SourceryAI

Loading

SourceryAI commented Jul 24, 2024 •

edited

Loading