DOC Ensures that StackingRegressor passes numpydoc validation #21444
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks @baam25simo One to go ;) |
ogrisel
pushed a commit
to ogrisel/scikit-learn
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2021
samronsin
pushed a commit
to samronsin/scikit-learn
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 30, 2021
glemaitre
pushed a commit
to glemaitre/scikit-learn
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 24, 2021
glemaitre
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 25, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reference Issues/PRs
Addresses #20308
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
StackingRegressorremoved fromDOCSTRING_IGNORE_LISTin test_docstrings.pyStackingRegressor: "See Also" section added.StackingRegressor.fit:returndescription added.