Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make Cosmos DTO objects immutable #1013
Make Cosmos DTO objects immutable #1013
Changes from 1 commit
1bc6f6e
8b82fd7
05a5c3c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove setters and make attributes final here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This constructor is used only in unit tests (
com.scalar.db.storage.cosmos.CosmosAdminTestBase#dropTable_WithMetadataLeft_ShouldDropContainerAndOnlyDeleteMetadata
). How about making the test use the new constructor or adding@VisibleForTesting
annotation here?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Jackson requires a default constructor so we need it not only for testing purpose. I will add a comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see. Where are we using Jackson databind for CosmosTableMetadata? I want to reproduce it and look into it as I'm a bit familiar with Jackson databind.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ooops. Sorry, I missed the background.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
JFYI: The following might be an option to work with Jackson databind internally used in Cosmos SDK, although it would make things a bit complicated.
I'm wondering why Cosmos SDK doesn't use https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-modules-java8/tree/master/parameter-names or equivalent on their side...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see. Thanks for sharing it.
Yes, it would be nice if the SDK were using that feature of Jackson.
Though, adding the jackson datababind dependency on our side to tinker with the Cosmos SDK default behavior seems a bit dangerous to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This can be declared as an interface
Set<String>
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah no, we can't do that because the insertion order is important for this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see. Understood. (Another option might be simply using
List
with de-duplications)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Likewise