-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enable CMPXCHG16B, SSE3, SAHF/LAHF and 128-bit Atomics (in nightly) in Windows x64 #120820
Merged
+11
−6
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d51e703
As Windows 10 requires certain features like CMPXCHG16B and a few oth…
CKingX d6766e2
Update x86_64_pc_windows_msvc.rs
CKingX fcb06f7
Update x86_64_pc_windows_msvc.rs
CKingX abeac8f
Update x86_64_uwp_windows_gnu.rs
CKingX 1c6dda7
Possibly removed merge policy
CKingX 376c7b9
Added sahf feature to windows targets
CKingX 2d25c3b
Updated test to account for added previous features (thanks erikdesja…
CKingX File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+sahf
too?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That I am not sure. x86-64-v2 onwards don't use sahf though it is listed in the features. CMPXCHG16B and SSE3 are listed. Does that mean Rustc doesn't yet make use of these instructions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure what you are seeing but x86-64-v2 totally does specify SAHF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/a9700904765590ca2fbf08c0cc36d0da1107d3a7/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.td#L808-L809
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I used this
Did some more digging and turns out SAHF seems to be for kernel rather than userspace code. Hence it is not listed in the rustc command I ran above.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It also seems to be tied to virtualization and for kernel space.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I've been researching this a bit more. On balance I do think we should add
+sahf
. While I don't think it's that important, it was seen fit to be included in x86-64-v2 feature level and I think we should align ourselves with that (although obviously dropping the SSE level back down to 3).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done!