Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

controllers/version: Pipelining database queries #10306

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2025

Conversation

eth3lbert
Copy link
Contributor

I just rewrote this using pipelining, but I haven't done any benchmarking (though I expect the performance improvement to be marginal).

Copy link
Member

@Turbo87 Turbo87 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hahaha, I had the exact same idea when I saw this bit of code the other day 😂

@Turbo87 Turbo87 added C-internal 🔧 Category: Nonessential work that would make the codebase more consistent or clear A-backend ⚙️ labels Jan 2, 2025
@Turbo87 Turbo87 merged commit dd90af8 into rust-lang:main Jan 2, 2025
8 checks passed
@eth3lbert eth3lbert deleted the piplined-owner-actions branch January 3, 2025 03:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-backend ⚙️ C-internal 🔧 Category: Nonessential work that would make the codebase more consistent or clear
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants