Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FIX: Call rustdoc test with the correct cfg flags of a package. #3242

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 2, 2016
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Next Next commit
FIX: Call rustdoc test with the correct cfg flags of a package.
There was a situation in which if you you had a lib that depends
on a package with features, whenever you ran the tests for the
package the `rustdoc test` call was failing because rustdoc
was called with the root cfg flags, not the package cfg flags.

This fix solves the issue by keeping track of the cfg flags
per package, so the rustdoc command will be generated with
the correct cfg flags.
  • Loading branch information
jhbabon committed Oct 31, 2016
commit e100ee96c209e88a590e4e58243f979f56bc3b88
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions src/cargo/ops/cargo_rustc/compilation.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -43,8 +43,8 @@ pub struct Compilation<'cfg> {

pub to_doc_test: Vec<Package>,

/// Features enabled during this compilation.
pub cfgs: HashSet<String>,
/// Features per package enabled during this compilation.
pub cfgs: HashMap<PackageId, HashSet<String>>,

pub target: String,

Expand All @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ impl<'cfg> Compilation<'cfg> {
binaries: Vec::new(),
extra_env: HashMap::new(),
to_doc_test: Vec::new(),
cfgs: HashSet::new(),
cfgs: HashMap::new(),
config: config,
target: String::new(),
}
Expand Down
23 changes: 12 additions & 11 deletions src/cargo/ops/cargo_rustc/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
use std::collections::HashMap;
use std::collections::{HashMap, HashSet};
use std::env;
use std::ffi::{OsStr, OsString};
use std::fs;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -81,7 +81,6 @@ pub fn compile_targets<'a, 'cfg: 'a>(ws: &Workspace<'cfg>,
})
}).collect::<Vec<_>>();

let root = try!(ws.current());
let mut cx = try!(Context::new(ws, resolve, packages, config,
build_config, profiles));

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -142,19 +141,21 @@ pub fn compile_targets<'a, 'cfg: 'a>(ws: &Workspace<'cfg>,
cx.compilation.libraries.insert(pkgid.clone(), v);
}
}
}

let root_pkg = root.package_id();
if let Some(feats) = cx.resolve.features(root_pkg) {
cx.compilation.cfgs.extend(feats.iter().map(|feat| {
format!("feature=\"{}\"", feat)
}));
if let Some(feats) = cx.resolve.features(&unit.pkg.package_id()) {
for feat in feats.iter() {
cx.compilation.cfgs.entry(unit.pkg.package_id().clone())
.or_insert(HashSet::new())
.insert(format!("feature=\"{}\"", feat));
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can call entry just once. Something like that should work.

cx.compilation.cfgs.entry(unit.pkg.package_id().clone())
    .or_insert(HashSet::new())
    .extend(feats.iter().map(|feat| format!("feature=\"{}\"", feat));

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@TeXitoi that looks better, I'll check it out.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@TeXitoi change done here fd8274a

}
}

for (&(ref pkg, _), output) in cx.build_state.outputs.lock().unwrap().iter() {
if pkg == root_pkg {
cx.compilation.cfgs.extend(output.cfgs.iter().cloned());
}
cx.compilation.cfgs.entry(pkg.clone())
.or_insert(HashSet::new())
.extend(output.cfgs.iter().cloned());

for dir in output.library_paths.iter() {
cx.compilation.native_dirs.insert(dir.clone());
}
Expand Down
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions src/cargo/ops/cargo_test.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -145,8 +145,10 @@ fn run_doc_tests(options: &TestOptions,
p.arg("--test-args").arg(&test_args.join(" "));
}

for cfg in compilation.cfgs.iter() {
p.arg("--cfg").arg(cfg);
if let Some(cfgs) = compilation.cfgs.get(&package.package_id()) {
for cfg in cfgs.iter() {
p.arg("--cfg").arg(cfg);
}
}

for (_, libs) in compilation.libraries.iter() {
Expand Down
70 changes: 70 additions & 0 deletions tests/test.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2262,3 +2262,73 @@ fn panic_abort_multiple() {
.arg("-p").arg("a"),
execs().with_status(0));
}

#[test]
fn pass_correct_cfgs_flags_to_rustdoc() {
let p = project("foo")
.file("Cargo.toml", r#"
[package]
name = "foo"
version = "0.1.0"
authors = []

[features]
default = ["a/default"]
nightly = ["a/nightly"]

[dependencies.a]
path = "libs/a"
default-features = false
"#)
.file("src/lib.rs", r#"
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
#[test]
fn it_works() {
assert!(true);
}
}
"#)
.file("libs/a/Cargo.toml", r#"
[package]
name = "a"
version = "0.1.0"
authors = []

[features]
default = ["serde_codegen"]
nightly = ["serde_derive"]

[dependencies]
serde_derive = { version = "0.8", optional = true }

[build-dependencies]
serde_codegen = { version = "0.8", optional = true }
"#)
.file("libs/a/src/lib.rs", r#"
#[cfg(feature = "serde_derive")]
const MSG: &'static str = "This is safe";

#[cfg(feature = "serde_codegen")]
const MSG: &'static str = "This is risky";

pub fn get() -> &'static str {
MSG
}
"#);

assert_that(p.cargo_process("test")
.arg("--package").arg("a")
.arg("--verbose"),
execs().with_status(0)
.with_stderr_contains("\
[DOCTEST] a
[RUNNING] `rustdoc --test [..]--cfg feature=\\\"serde_codegen\\\"[..]`"));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah yeah the escaping here is subtly different on Windows (different shell), so it's fine to just match the word serde_codegen being passed here

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@alexcrichton sounds good. I'll change it.


assert_that(p.cargo_process("test")
.arg("--verbose"),
execs().with_status(0)
.with_stderr_contains("\
[DOCTEST] foo
[RUNNING] `rustdoc --test [..]--cfg feature=\\\"a\\\"[..]`"));
}